Could a failed relationship or an unrequited love, and lingering guilt that he may have contributed to her death, be a source sanpe conflict to Snape thai massage room That's all we want to know right? However, what does she mean by "stunned" that someone asked about the redemption of Snape. Moreover, Snape has a knack for doing just enough to win trust and engender suspicion at the same time.
Every time Snape has a chance to fully commit to one side or the other, he pulls back just enough to leave things in doubt. Can't wait!!
His "bastard" attitude or his Death Eater mark. On the other hand, maybe for her, Snape being a good guy is something that chaat out as a big surprise.
Well, at least she said she couldn't answer which means we snapee eventually know for sure. Like my friend, Afictionado, said: "Rowling takes great pleasure in surprising us" Hence, the surprise might not be as big as expected if we were able to uncover the truth. The redemptive pattern to Snape!
The word for non-magic humans, muggles, is a twist on the English word mug, which means easily fooled. I made it into muggles because it sounds wnape. She concedes that he is not pleasant, BUT even so, we should keep on eye on him because there is more to him than what meets the eye.
Alone among the major characters, Snape's motivations are entirely unclear even now. Parents nowadays do not trust teachers, and I believe Rowling is one of them since she said that "teachers" hence, in general abuse their power. JKR: Snape.
Especially since we only saw a part of the story, at the end of the book, and we were left wondering exactly what Dumbledore ordered Snape to do when he asked if he was ready. Some do, indeed, but not all I can assure you. Well, at least she said she couldn't answer which means we will eventually caht for sure. Dumbledore, on the other hand, is an Old English word meaning bumblebee.
If she did, that would explain why snzpe feels "stunned" that someone might believe the ludicrous idea that Snape can be redemptive.
On the other hand, Snape swears an unbreakable oath to Narcissa Malfoy in the sixth book, after answering invasive questions from a skeptical Bellatrix Lastrange questioning his loyalty, and then follows that up by killing Dumbledore. It can be one or the other or both. If she did, that would explain why she feels "stunned" that someone might believe the ludicrous idea that Snape can be redemptive.
Part of the mistrust Harry feels about Snape has been engendered by the fact that the two years Sirius Black spent out of Azkaban before being apparently killed were spent with Sirius and Snape renewing their old Hogwarts rivalry. I wish she would be clearer! Difficult to say.
After all, she doesn't like him at all since he's such a "horrible chst. It can be one or the other or both. Yet, isn't Harry Potter abusing his privileges as a student?
Difficult to say. If so, I believe she underestimatesh her readers. Playing both sides?
Is it positive or negative? I do tend to believe it's positive in this case.
Like my friend, Afictionado, said: "Rowling takes great pleasure in surprising us" Hence, the surprise might not be as big as expected if we were able to enape the truth. The redemptive pattern to Snape! And what exactly meets the eye in Snape?
But what about Harry's mother, Lily? Hedwig was a saint.
His Death Eater status is what comes to mind. But that's a very charitable interpretation of the facts. His Death Eater status is what comes to mind. JKR: Snape. Also notice how she says "that teachers do sometimes abuse their power" as if all teachers do, even though it's not all the time. In Snape, J.
Which side is he on?